That brings us here to the tie neck top from Simplicity. I purchased this in the early summer and recently made it. As I prepared to write this review, I couldn't find it on their website or on patternreview.com. Turns out it has been repackaged as Simplicity 1661. (Not sure which is chicken and which is egg). Below is my review and my project photos.
Pattern
Description: Misses’ Top with Sleeve Variations
Pattern Sizing: 6-14. I cut the 10.
Did it look like the photo/drawing on the pattern envelope once you were done sewing with it? Yes.
Were the instructions easy to follow? They were very easy to follow.
What did you particularly like or dislike about the pattern?
I liked the details of the top. The peek-a-boo sleeves, the tie neck, pleats and the back slit. I like that there are many variations possible in this pattern.
Pattern Sizing: 6-14. I cut the 10.
Did it look like the photo/drawing on the pattern envelope once you were done sewing with it? Yes.
Were the instructions easy to follow? They were very easy to follow.
What did you particularly like or dislike about the pattern?
I liked the details of the top. The peek-a-boo sleeves, the tie neck, pleats and the back slit. I like that there are many variations possible in this pattern.
Once I made the top, I decided that I do not like the back slit of the
top. I think it goes up too high and causes the fabric to sit in an
unflattering way.
Fabric Used: A tone on tone white cotton with a circle, flower motif.
Pattern alterations or any design changes you made: None.
Would you sew it again? Would you recommend it to others?
I will make it again in a lighter weight fabric and I will omit the back slit. I may cut the 8 next time, but I am still on the fence about that. It is a bit billowy in back and I am not sure if that is because of the slit or the size.
Conclusion: Good pattern with unique variations.
Peek a boo sleeves |
Back Slit that I will omit next time. |
The slit is really long |
Sleeve and neck tie |
Pleat details on back on my dress form |
All tucked in. |
No comments:
Post a Comment