Pages

Thursday, June 9, 2016

On Trend and Off the Shoulder

                     

So I was kinda in love with the Simplicity 8124 Cynthia Rowley off the shoulder dress when I saw it. It is fun and flirty and I thought it would be cute to make. I have seen pattern reviews and loved a few. I had doubts about the length and fabric fullness at the bust, but decided to give it a go.

                                       
My dress did not turn out as expected; it was a disaster! There is so much ease in this dress it was unflattering. The shoulders kept rolling up and when down, I felt like I could not raise my arms. I spent some time fiddling with it to make it work. In the end, decided to move on.


I thought I had a similar style in my stash and found Simplicity Jiffy 8978. I used it to make a dress a few years ago that was hidden in my closet. It was the look and feel for which I was going.

                                  
I shortened the dress to the point of the side slits of the pattern and whipped this up.


I love the narrower silhouette and wide drapey sleeves. The shoulders stay in place and are very comfortable.



I like that if I choose, I can wear the shoulders up too!


It feels good to bounce back from a sewing fail with a good result.



It was so fast to come together, I made another in an Ankara, wax print. 


The weight of the wax print is heavier than the lightweight denim of the other dress. This makes the sleeves stand up in a slightly more structured way and it gathers less on the elastic.


I love that a bold fabric like this wax print can take a simple shape and add some drama.


 This was the feel I was hoping for with my Simplicity 8124 version.


I compared the pattern pieces for both patterns to see the difference. There is an 4-inch difference at the fold on the front and back. That is a 16-inch difference around! The rest of the pattern is pretty much the same.

Cynthia Rowley -----------------------------------------Out of Print Jiffy
If you want a more streamlined version of the Cynthia Rowley dress, cut your size then fold that pattern down four inches before cutting your fabric. There is a wider triangular base on the C.R. pattern which you can taper down if you like. My concern was the bulk at the bust so I would leave that part alone.

Happy Sewing,
Bianca

18 comments:

  1. The Jiffy silhouette is so much better! Nice save. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Cynthia Rowley pattern for some reason runs so big, you are so petite you probably should have cut a extra small. So glad you had another pattern. Love the Ankara print.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am so glad I had the other pattern too! I think even the XS would have not looked right.

      Delete
  3. The Cynthia Rowley pattern for some reason runs so big, you are so petite you probably should have cut a extra small. So glad you had another pattern. Love the Ankara print.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like this version of the the "gathered" shoulder" off the shoulder way more than that other ridiculously oversized pattern. So glad you pointed this one out for others to consider.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Andrea! The other was so awful I couldn't even take a picture in it!

      Delete
  5. Lucky you that you had the other pattern. Your stash pattern results are so much better and you look great in that version of the off shoulder. I too purchased the Cynthia Rowley pattern for $1 and now I think I will go web searching for the "jiffy" pattern you used. Love the denim and wax print dresses a lot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Linda! I saw a few on etsy and ebay so you I think you will have some luck.

      Delete
  6. Great dresses! That sleeve shape and length is so much better for summer too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! I will be wearing both lots this summer!

      Delete
  7. Bianca, you could make a gunnysack look fabulous because of your beauty. You do bold prints so well. As always your work is lovely. For an older pattern (70's ?) It sure looks current. I am curious, were there finished bust measurements on the pattern pieces for either company? And if so, what was the difference? Thanks for sharing your dress and your findings! And your shoes- wow!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Maureen, you are too kind! Bold prints go a long way for giving pop to the simple shapes I like. I checked the pattern pieces, the bust measurement is 32 1/2 and and I measured the dress flat and it is 40 inches. The size small CR pattern has a 32 1/2 - 34 1/2 bust measurement and a 60 inch finished measurement! Shoe wise, I assume you are talking about my awesome gladiator sandals? I am so happy I found them! They are by Breckelle's and can be found on Amazon. I have a skinny calf and these allow me to adjust them down.

      Delete
  8. I LOVE both dresses! Thank you so much for showing the amount of excessive ease in the CR dress. I wondered about that!
    Sue

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Sue! I am glad I could help! All the reviews I read were raving about it. I wish I had that info before making it.

      Delete
  9. I'm in total agreement with Maureen's comments. As soon as I saw the first picture of your dress, I thought "wow!". Is the blue dress silk or polished linen? It looks like it has a sheen to it. The shoes!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Tina! You are too sweet! The blue is a lightweight denim. No sheen, just my sparkle! LOL! :) I was given it by a friend and don't know anything else about it.

      Shoe wise, I assume you are talking about my awesome gladiator sandals? I am so happy I found them! They are by Breckelle's and can be found on Amazon. I have a skinny calf and these allow me to adjust them down.

      Delete
  10. Your dresses look really fab!!
    (16" is a lot of difference between the two patterns, wow!)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Both dresses are beautiful - love them!

    ReplyDelete